Registration vs. Recording
(author unknown - source: citizens of the United States of America)
"Registration" comes from Latin "rex, regis" etc. meaning regal. So think about what occurs to whatever you 'register' - you hand legal title over to the Crown. When you register anything with the public, it releases legal title to the government corporation and leaves you with only equitable title - the right to use, not own, and for that use you will pay a 'use' tax which is every tax, be it income, sin, sales, property, etc. as opposed to lawful taxes,custom, excise and impost [see Antichresis]. So that it doesn't appear that the government now owns the property which you have registered they put it in a name which so much resembles your own that you won't suspect it, however, the NAME is owned by the government. If you choose rather to record your legal title to your property with the public, you maintain your status as Title Owner. This is one of the most important things you can ever learn for the sake of your commercial affairs. [ There also seems to be an overlaying federal enclave of jurisdictional services that are consolidating the crowns (legal adressed) property with a situs address residing the property into another jurisdiction of taxable IRS laws.]
The best example of the effects of registration is the birth certificate. A bankrupt entity - city, state/ province, country - cannot operate in commerce. So how do they manage? Since USA/CA have been bankrupt for decades, having no substance such as gold and silver to back it, the only asset it has are men and women and our labour. We are the collateral for the interest on the loan of the World Bank. Each of us is registered, via the application for a birth certificate. The Treasury issues a bond on the birth certificate and the bond is sold at a securities exchange and bought by the FRB/BoC, which then uses it as collateral to issue bank notes. The bond is held in trust for the Feds at the Depository Trust Corporation [DTCC]. We are the surety on said bonds. Our labour/energy is then payable at some future date. Hence we become the `transmitting utility' for the transmission of energy. The USG/CAG, in order to provide necessary goods and services, created a commercial bond (promissory note), by pledging the property, labour, life and body of its citizens, as payment for the debt (bankruptcy). This commercial bond made chattel (property) out of us all. We became nothing more than `human resources' and collateral for the debt. This was without our knowledge and/or our consent, via the filing (registration) of our birth certificates. When mums apply for a birth certificate, the application is registered. The legal title of her baby is then transferred from mum to the State. Mum is left with equitable title of her baby whom she can use for a fee - a `use tax' - and since the property does not belong to her, she has to treat it in the manner which the owner wants.
Colonel Edward Mandell House is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave the American people. He stated, in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson (President 1913 - 1921),
"[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property [that's you and your children] in a national system [State Registrar] designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging [antichresis] . By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattels [property] and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the lawmerchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading [Birth Certificates & Titles] to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their [Natural] rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of benefits [,services] and privileges. This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call "Social [Security] Insurance." Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office (presidency) of our dummy corporation (USA) to foment this plot against America."- Colonel Edward Mandell House
"Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves."-- Andrew Jackson
Civil Code Cal. § 2986. Pledge, what . Pledge is a deposit of personal property by way of security for the performance of another act. Increase of property pledged: Post, § 2989.
Note. Much difficulty has arisen in determining whether a certain transaction is a pledge or a chattel mortgage, the question generally being whether the title has passed or not. In this state, it has been seen, title never passes in case of property conveyed or deposited as security: Post, § 2888. And, also, whenever the possession of personal property is transferred as security only, it is to be treated as a pledge: Post, § 2987. And even a chattel mortgage, when the possession of the property mortgaged is transferred, becomes a pledge: Ante, I 2924, and post, § 2987. The question is therefore much simplified, possession being the criterion.
Legislation § 2986. Enacted March 21, 1872
____________________________________________________________
"The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests." — Rothschild Bros. of London, 1863
more info:
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/SMIGRA */Pignus.html